Re: [PATCH] Staging: i2o: fixed various code style issues in i2o_block.c

[Dan Carpenter]

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:12:14PM +0200, Yorick Rommers wrote:
> From: Yorick <yorick-rommers@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Don't include a From: unless you are sending a patch someone else wrote.
Otherwise we prefer to get it from your email From.  Also you forgot
your last name.

> @@ -488,8 +488,8 @@ static int i2o_block_reply(struct i2o_controller *c, u32 m,
>  		 *      Don't stick a supertrak100 into cache aggressive modes
>  		 */
>  
> -		osm_err("TID %03x error status: 0x%02x, detailed status: "
> -			"0x%04x\n", (le32_to_cpu(msg->u.head[1]) >> 12 & 0xfff),
> +		osm_err("TID %03x error status: 0x%02x, detailed status: 0x%04x\n",
> +      (le32_to_cpu(msg->u.head[1]) >> 12 & 0xfff),
>  			status >> 24, status & 0xffff);

The new indenting is wrong.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/