Re: [PATCH] clk: check for invalid parent index of orphans in __clk_init()

From: Michael Turquette
Date: Mon Apr 13 2015 - 15:13:05 EST


Quoting Rhyland Klein (2015-02-17 08:58:29)
> On 2/15/2015 7:33 AM, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> > If a mux clock is initialised (by hardware or firmware) with an
> > invalid parent, its ->get_parent() can return an out of range
> > index. For example, the generic mux clock attempts to return
> > -EINVAL, which due to the u8 return type ends up a rather large
> > number. Using this index with the parent_names[] array results
> > in an invalid pointer and (usually) a crash in the following
> > strcmp().
> >
> > This patch adds a check for the parent index being in range,
> > ignoring clocks reporting invalid values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Rhyland Klein <rklein@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/clk.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index d48ac71..bc0662b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -1950,7 +1950,8 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk)
> > hlist_for_each_entry_safe(orphan, tmp2, &clk_orphan_list, child_node) {
> > if (orphan->num_parents && orphan->ops->get_parent) {
> > i = orphan->ops->get_parent(orphan->hw);
> > - if (!strcmp(clk->name, orphan->parent_names[i]))
> > + if (i >= 0 && i < orphan->num_parents &&
> > + !strcmp(clk->name, orphan->parent_names[i]))
> > __clk_reparent(orphan, clk);
> > continue;
> > }
> >
>
> This works for me and is less invasive than the original patch series.
>
> Tested-by: Rhyland Klein <rklein@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied.

Thanks,
Mike

>
> -rhyland
>
> --
> nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/