Re: [linux-next PATCH] mlx5: wrong page mask if CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT enabled for 32Bit architectures

From: Honggang LI
Date: Mon Apr 13 2015 - 05:19:53 EST


On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 06:47:11AM +0000, Eli Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:33:33AM +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
> >
> > Yes, replaced all of the PAGE_MASK in the file. Please see attched new
> > patch.
> >
>
> I think you need to send the new patch inline in your email.
>

I will resent the patch.

> > >
> > > @@ -241,7 +243,7 @@ static void free_4k(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u64 addr) static int alloc_system_page(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, u16 func_id) {
> > > struct page *page;
> > > - u64 addr;
> > > + u64 addr = 0; [Eli] Why is this required?
> >
> > For 32bit architectures, if CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT disabled and
> > physical memory is less than 4GB, dma_map_page will return an u32 integer
> > less than 0xffff_ffff. And if addr had been initialized with random
> > rubbish in the stack of alloc_system_page, the high four bytes is
> > unpredictable. The new mask, MLX5_NUM_4K_IN_PAGE, will reserve the high
> > four bytes. So, free_4k/find_fw_page will randomly failed.
> >
>
> Sorry, I still don't understand the issue here. MLX5_NUM_4K_IN_PAGE is
> not a mask and will always get the correct value which is fairly
> small.

Sorry. It was a typo. It should be MLX5_U64_4K_PAGE_MASK.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/