Re: about the flood of trivial patches and the Code of Conduct (was: Re: [PATCH 19/25] sched: Use bool function return values of true/false not 1/0)

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:12:46AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Pointing out this truth and protecting against such abusive flood of 
> trivial patches is not against the code of conduct I signed.

I totally agree, it's not "against" the code of conflict that I helped
write.

Joe, you know better than to send trivial stuff to maintainers who don't
want it.  Send it through the trivial maintainer for subsystems that
have expressed annoyance at this, it's not the first time this has
happened.

Some maintainers, like me, are fine with your types of patches, I'd
stick to those subsystems if you like doing this type of work.

Also, don't send stuff that is broken, that's not the sign of a trivial
patch :(

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/