Re: Unreliable hibernation on Lenovo x230 (regression)

[Ingo Molnar]

* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:24 AM, joeyli <jlee@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >>
> >> I took the commit 8f778bbc542ddf8f6243b21d6aca087e709cabdc as the base for further checking (I started building before I read your message). It's a descendant of 4.0-rc6, so I hope it's not going to make a difference.
> >>
> >> Results:
> >> 8f778bb : bad
> >> 8f778bb + reverted 84c91b7 : good
> >> 8f778bb + patch [1] : good
> >
> > Thanks for your dmesg on bko#96111.
> > I checked and confirm there have the situation of setup_data reserved as E820_RESERVED_KERN.
> > I will add comment on bugzilla.
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> [1]:
> >> x86: Kill E820_RESERVED_KERN  https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/4/434 as suggested in joeyli's other email.
> >
> > I think just revert 84c91b7ae until Yinghai Lu's patches merged to v4.1.
> > I will resend 84c91b7ae patch until Yinghai Lu's patches merged.
> 
> Can you please put https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/4/434
> into tip?

I cannot apply this patch without a readable changelog, see:

  http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1503.1/05342.html

Your changelog (again) violates about half of the principles I tried 
to outline in that post.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/