Re: [tip:timers/core] clockevents: Fix cpu_down() race for hrtimer based broadcasting

[Preeti U Murthy]

On 04/03/2015 04:20 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Preeti U Murthy <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 04/02/2015 08:00 PM, tip-bot for Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>>> Commit-ID:  345527b1edce8df719e0884500c76832a18211c3
>>> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/345527b1edce8df719e0884500c76832a18211c3
>>> Author:     Preeti U Murthy <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> AuthorDate: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:59:19 +0530
>>> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CommitDate: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 14:25:39 +0200
>>>
>>> clockevents: Fix cpu_down() race for hrtimer based broadcasting
>>>
>>> It was found when doing a hotplug stress test on POWER, that the
>>> machine either hit softlockups or rcu_sched stall warnings.  The
>>> issue was traced to commit:
>>>
>>>   7cba160ad789 ("powernv/cpuidle: Redesign idle states management")
>>>
>>> which exposed the cpu_down() race with hrtimer based broadcast mode:
>>>
>>>   5d1638acb9f6 ("tick: Introduce hrtimer based broadcast")
>>>
>>> The race is the following:
>>>
>>> Assume CPU1 is the CPU which holds the hrtimer broadcasting duty
>>> before it is taken down.
>>>
>>> 	CPU0					CPU1
>>>
>>> 	cpu_down()				take_cpu_down()
>>> 						disable_interrupts()
>>>
>>> 	cpu_die()
>>>
>>> 	while (CPU1 != CPU_DEAD) {
>>> 		msleep(100);
>>> 		switch_to_idle();
>>> 		stop_cpu_timer();
>>> 		schedule_broadcast();
>>> 	}
>>>
>>> 	tick_cleanup_cpu_dead()
>>> 		take_over_broadcast()
>>>
>>> So after CPU1 disabled interrupts it cannot handle the broadcast
>>> hrtimer anymore, so CPU0 will be stuck forever.
>>>
>>> Fix this by explicitly taking over broadcast duty before cpu_die().
>>>
>>> This is a temporary workaround. What we really want is a callback
>>> in the clockevent device which allows us to do that from the dying
>>> CPU by pushing the hrtimer onto a different cpu. That might involve
>>> an IPI and is definitely more complex than this immediate fix.
>>>
>>> Changelog was picked up from:
>>>
>>>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/16/213
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Preeti U. Murthy <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: nicolas.pitre@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Fixes: http://linuxppc.10917.n7.nabble.com/offlining-cpus-breakage-td88619.html
>>> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150330092410.24979.59887.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [ Merged it to the latest timer tree, renamed the callback, tidied up the changelog. ]
>>> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Can this be marked for stable too please?
> 
> It can be forwarded to -stable once it has gone upstream in the merge 
> window and has gone through some testing upstream as well. The 
> breakage itself was introduced in the v3.19 merge window, so it's an 
> older regression - and the fix is not simple either.

Ok I see.

Thanks

Regards
Preeti U Murthy
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/