Re: [PATCH/RFC 5/6] staging: board: Add support for devices with complex dependencies

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Laurent,

On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +     for (i = 0; i < dev->ngpios; i++)
>> +             gpio_request_one(dev->gpios[i].gpio, dev->gpios[i].flags,
>> +                              pdev->name);
>
> Aren't GPIO numbers dynamic too in DT-based systems ? Beside, shouldn't it be

Apparently not, as the old legacy number still works, and it doesn't work
without.

> the responsibility of the drievr to request the GPIOs it needs ?

As far as I understand it, on Armadillo this is used more for platform
configuration than for device configuration, as it affects multiple devices
(the comment says DBGMD/LCDC0/FSIA MUX).

I guess I could use a "gpio-hog" subnode in DT instead, but then we're already
implementing the conversion to DT ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/