Re: [PATCH RFC 02/10] dpaa_eth: add support for DPAA Ethernet

[Madalin-Cristian Bucur]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 19:19 +0300, Madalin Bucur wrote:
> > This introduces the Freescale Data Path Acceleration Architecture
> > (DPAA) Ethernet driver (dpaa_eth) that builds upon the DPAA QMan,
> > BMan, PAMU and FMan drivers to deliver Ethernet connectivity on
> > the Freescale DPAA QorIQ platforms.
> 
> trivial notes:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c
> []
> > @@ -0,0 +1,835 @@
> > +/* Copyright 2008 - 2015 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
> met:
> > + *     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> > + *	 notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> > + *     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> > + *	 notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> > + *	 documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> distribution.
> > + *     * Neither the name of Freescale Semiconductor nor the
> > + *	 names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote
> products
> > + *	 derived from this software without specific prior written permission.
> > + *
> > + * ALTERNATIVELY, this software may be distributed under the terms of
> the
> > + * GNU General Public License ("GPL") as published by the Free Software
> > + * Foundation, either version 2 of that License or (at your option) any
> > + * later version.
> 
> Given this is GPLed here, does the first block need to exist?

I'll replace that with this license text:

/* Freescale(R) DPAA Ethernet Linux driver
 * Copyright 2008 - 2015 Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
 *
 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
 * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
 * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 * 
 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 * GNU General Public License for more details.
 * 
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 * along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
 */

> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) \
> > +	KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> 
> single line please

I will address this.

> > +#include <linux/if_arp.h>	/* arp_hdr_len() */
> > +#include <linux/if_vlan.h>	/* VLAN_HLEN */
> > +#include <linux/icmp.h>		/* struct icmphdr */
> > +#include <linux/ip.h>		/* struct iphdr */
> > +#include <linux/ipv6.h>		/* struct ipv6hdr */
> > +#include <linux/udp.h>		/* struct udphdr */
> > +#include <linux/tcp.h>		/* struct tcphdr */
> > +#include <linux/net.h>		/* net_ratelimit() */
> > +#include <linux/if_ether.h>	/* ETH_P_IP and ETH_P_IPV6 */
> 
> These comments are pretty unusual and likely incomplete
> so they're probably not useful.

I will clean-up all files.

> > +static u8 debug = -1;
> > +module_param(debug, byte, S_IRUGO);
> > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Module/Driver verbosity level");
> 
> default on?  Likely default off would be better.

Found several drivers that keep it by default enabled, should I change it to off?

> > +static void _dpa_rx_error(struct net_device *net_dev,
> > +			  const struct dpa_priv_s	*priv,
> > +			  struct dpa_percpu_priv_s *percpu_priv,
> > +			  const struct qm_fd *fd,
> > +			  u32 fqid)
> > +{
> > +	/* limit common, possibly innocuous Rx FIFO Overflow errors'
> > +	 * interference with zero-loss convergence benchmark results.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (likely(fd->status & FM_FD_STAT_ERR_PHYSICAL))
> > +		pr_warn_once("non-zero error counters in fman statistics
> (sysfs)\n");
> > +	else
> > +		if (netif_msg_hw(priv) && net_ratelimit())
> > +			netdev_err(net_dev, "Err FD status = 0x%08x\n",
> > +				   fd->status & FM_FD_STAT_RX_ERRORS);
> 
> 	if (netif_msg_<foo>(priv))
> 		netdev_<level>(netdev, ...)
> 
> uses can be written like:
> 
> 	netif_<level>(priv, <foo>, netdev, ...);
> 
> So this is perhaps better as
> 
> 	if (likely(fd->status & FM_FD_STAT_ERR_PHYSICAL))
> 		pr_warn_once("non-zero error counters in fman statistics
> (sysfs)\n");
> 	else if (net_ratelimit())
> 		netif_err(priv, hw, net_dev, "Err FD status = 0x%08x\n",
> 			  fd->status & FM_FD_STAT_RX_ERRORS);

Thank you, will try to address all the occurrences.

> > +
> > +	percpu_priv->stats.rx_errors++;
> > +
> > +	dpa_fd_release(net_dev, fd);,
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void _dpa_tx_error(struct net_device		*net_dev,
> > +			  const struct dpa_priv_s	*priv,
> > +			  struct dpa_percpu_priv_s	*percpu_priv,
> > +			  const struct qm_fd		*fd,
> > +			  u32				 fqid)
> > +{
> > +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +
> > +	if (netif_msg_hw(priv) && net_ratelimit())
> > +		netdev_warn(net_dev, "FD status = 0x%08x\n",
> > +			    fd->status & FM_FD_STAT_TX_ERRORS);
> 
> 	netif_warn(priv, hw, net_dev, etc...);
> 

Will change.

> > +static int __cold dpa_eth_priv_stop(struct net_device *net_dev)
> 
> Use of __cold is pretty unusual in drivers
> 
> > +static struct dpa_bp * __cold
> > +dpa_priv_bp_probe(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct dpa_bp *dpa_bp;
> > +
> > +	dpa_bp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dpa_bp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (unlikely(!dpa_bp)) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "devm_kzalloc() failed\n");
> 
> No need for this alloc failure message

Will remove.
 
> > +static int dpa_priv_bp_create(struct net_device *net_dev, struct dpa_bp
> *dpa_bp,
> > +			      size_t count)
> > +{
> > +	struct dpa_priv_s *priv = netdev_priv(net_dev);
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	if (netif_msg_probe(priv))
> > +		dev_dbg(net_dev->dev.parent,
> > +			"Using private BM buffer pools\n");
> 
> Why emit using dev.parent?

Will address.

> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth_common.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth_common.h
> 
> > +int __cold dpa_start(struct net_device *net_dev);
> > +int __cold dpa_stop(struct net_device *net_dev);
> > +void __cold dpa_timeout(struct net_device *net_dev);
> 
> Marking a function prototype with an attribute means
> the implementation doesn't need the same attribute.

We'll remove those attributes completely.

> > +/* Convenience macros for storing/retrieving the skb back-pointers.
> > + *
> > + * NB: @off is an offset from a (struct sk_buff **) pointer!
> > + */
> > +#define DPA_WRITE_SKB_PTR(skb, skbh, addr, off) \
> > +	{ \
> > +		skbh = (struct sk_buff **)addr; \
> > +		*(skbh + (off)) = skb; \
> > +	}
> > +#define DPA_READ_SKB_PTR(skb, skbh, addr, off) \
> > +	{ \
> > +		skbh = (struct sk_buff **)addr; \
> > +		skb = *(skbh + (off)); \
> > +	}
> 
> Maybe these are better as static inlines?

Probably we can do this change and then use something like this in the code:
dpa_write_skb_ptr(skb, &skbh, addr, off);
dpa_read_skb_ptr(&skb, &skbh, addr, off);

Thank you,
Madalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/