Re: Build regression in next-20150331

From: Tyler Baker
Date: Thu Apr 02 2015 - 23:00:00 EST


On 2 April 2015 at 01:29, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 11:46:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> > > ---
>> > > kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 2 ++
>> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> > >
>> > > Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
>> > > ===================================================================
>> > > --- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
>> > > +++ linux-pm/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
>> > > @@ -110,7 +110,9 @@ static inline int tick_broadcast_update_
>> > > /* Set the periodic handler in non broadcast mode */
>> > > static inline void tick_set_periodic_handler(struct clock_event_device *dev, int broadcast)
>> > > {
>> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>> > > dev->event_handler = tick_handle_periodic;
>> > > +#endif
>> > > }
>> > > #endif /* !BROADCAST */
>
>> Peter, do you think the above is acceptable or do I need to do anything more
>> sophisticated to fix this? [The alternative would be probably to prepare an
>> empty definition of tick_handle_periodic() for CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS and
>> move the definition of struct clock_event_device from under that Kconfig
>> option.]
>
>
> Does not something like the below make more sense? The entire broadcast
> thing doesn't make sense if we don't have generic_clockevents.
>
> Should we wrap more in generic_clockevents there?
>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
> index 2a1563a..5569e65 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
> @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static inline int tick_check_oneshot_change(int allow_nohz) { return 0; }
> #endif /* !TICK_ONESHOT */
>
> /* Broadcasting support */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> extern int tick_device_uses_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev, int cpu);
> extern void tick_install_broadcast_device(struct clock_event_device *dev);
> @@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ static inline void tick_set_periodic_handler(struct clock_event_device *dev, int
> dev->event_handler = tick_handle_periodic;
> }
> #endif /* !BROADCAST */
> +#endif /* GENERIC */
>
> /* Functions related to oneshot broadcasting */
> #if defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST) && defined(CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT)

Tested-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@xxxxxxxxxx>

Looks good to me.

Applied on top of next-20150402[0]:

---
kernel/time/tick-internal.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
index 2a1563a..e332bb4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-internal.h
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ static inline int tick_check_oneshot_change(int
allow_nohz) { return 0; }
#endif /* !TICK_ONESHOT */

/* Broadcasting support */
+#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
extern int tick_device_uses_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev, int cpu);
extern void tick_install_broadcast_device(struct clock_event_device *dev);
@@ -114,7 +115,7 @@ static inline void
tick_set_periodic_handler(struct clock_event_device *dev, int
dev->event_handler = tick_handle_periodic;
}
#endif /* !BROADCAST */
+#endif /* GENERIC */
/* Functions related to oneshot broadcasting */
#if defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST) &&
defined(CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT)
extern void tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc);
---

Tyler

[0] http://kernelci.org/build/tbaker/kernel/v4.0-rc6-8742-g76c8cce3+gcc-linaro-4.9-2015.02/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/