Re: [PATCH 2/3] locking: ww_mutex: Allow to use rt_mutex instead of mutex for the baselock

[Mike Galbraith]

On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 13:36 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 03/06/2015 01:16 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> 
> >> Okay so what I the point made here? It is only about the config option,
> >> right? What are the preferences here:
> >> [ ] yes, the way it is now
> > Is my personal preference, but I'm not a locking expert(TM).
> 
> Lets see what Mike says. I currently don't see any reason for people to
> switch between both implementations except for testing. And if it
> remains hidden then nobody changing code ww_mutex tests against
> rt_mutex. That way there is hope :)

I don't see much point in an all or nothing config option, it'll just
sit idle.  If folks can use them where they see fit, they might just do
that.  We have mutex/rtmutex, so why not ww_mutex/rt_ww_mutex?  Looks
like a natural extension to me.

	-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/