Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: rtl8723au: Remove unnecessary OOM message

[Joe Perches]

On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 11:08 -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Fri, 6 Mar 2015, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> >> Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> > This patch reduces the kernel size by removing error messages that duplicate
> >> > the normal OOM message.
> >> > A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> >> > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr)
> >> This patch removes useful warnings about what allocation failed. The
> >> messages removed are NOT duplicate!
> > Is it really the case that the information can't be reconstructed from the
> > information generated by kmalloc on failure?  To my understanding there is
> > a stack trace, and from scanning through the changes I see only one change
> > per function, so perhaps the stack trace already makes it clear where the
> > problem occurred?
> It may be possible to backtrack, but this change just makes it harder.
> There are tons of real issues to fix in this driver, this patch just
> increases the risk of patch conflicts for no real gain.

Making the allocation less likely to fail for
low memory systems is a gain.

The allocation failures themselves are low
likelihood events.  Determining which specific
memory allocation failure occurred has near
nil value.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/