Re: [PATCH 4.0-rc1 v17 5/6] x86/nmi: Use common printk functions

[Daniel Thompson]

On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 01:54 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Much of the code sitting in arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c to support 
> > safe all-cpu backtracing from NMI has been copied to printk.c to 
> > make it accessible to other architectures.
> > 
> > Port the x86 NMI backtrace to the generic code.
> 
> Is there any difference between the generic and the x86 code as they 
> stand today?

Shouldn't be any user observable change but there are some changes,
mostly due to review comments.

1. The seq_buf structures are initialized at boot and *after* they
   are consumed (originally they were initialized just before use).

2. The generic code doesn't maintain an equivalent of backtrace_mask
   (which was essentially a copy of cpus_online made when backtracing
   was requested) and instead iterates using for_each_possible_cpu()
   to initialize and dump the seq_buf:s.


Daniel.


PS
The main piece that git code motion tracking should follow if I squashed
the generic and x86 patches together would be nmi_vprintk(). I suspect
most of the rest would be missed as the code copies is in pretty small
fragments.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/