Re: [PATCH v10 07/11] sched: get CPU's usage statistic

[Vincent Guittot]

On 3 March 2015 at 13:47, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 27/02/15 15:54, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Monitor the usage level of each group of each sched_domain level. The usage is
>> the portion of cpu_capacity_orig that is currently used on a CPU or group of
>> CPUs. We use the utilization_load_avg to evaluate the usage level of each
>> group.
>>
>> The utilization_load_avg only takes into account the running time of the CFS
>> tasks on a CPU with a maximum value of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE when the CPU is fully
>> utilized. Nevertheless, we must cap utilization_load_avg which can be temporaly
>
> s/temporaly/temporally
>
>> greater than SCHED_LOAD_SCALE after the migration of a task on this CPU and
>> until the metrics are stabilized.
>>
>> The utilization_load_avg is in the range [0..SCHED_LOAD_SCALE] to reflect the
>> running load on the CPU whereas the available capacity for the CFS task is in
>> the range [0..cpu_capacity_orig]. In order to test if a CPU is fully utilized
>> by CFS tasks, we have to scale the utilization in the cpu_capacity_orig range
>> of the CPU to get the usage of the latter. The usage can then be compared with
>> the available capacity (ie cpu_capacity) to deduct the usage level of a CPU.
>>
>> The frequency scaling invariance of the usage is not taken into account in this
>> patch, it will be solved in another patch which will deal with frequency
>> scaling invariance on the running_load_avg.
>
> The use of underscores in running_load_avg implies to me that this is a
> data member of struct sched_avg or something similar. But there is no
> running_load_avg in the current code. However, I can see that
> sched_avg::*running_avg_sum* (and therefore
> cfs_rq::*utilization_load_avg*) are frequency scale invariant.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 10f84c3..faf61a2 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -4781,6 +4781,33 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int target)
>>  done:
>>       return target;
>>  }
>> +/*
>> + * get_cpu_usage returns the amount of capacity of a CPU that is used by CFS
>> + * tasks. The unit of the return value must capacity so we can compare the
>
> s/must capacity/must be the one of capacity
>
>> + * usage with the capacity of the CPU that is available for CFS task (ie
>> + * cpu_capacity).
>> + * cfs.utilization_load_avg is the sum of running time of runnable tasks on a
>> + * CPU. It represents the amount of utilization of a CPU in the range
>> + * [0..SCHED_LOAD_SCALE].  The usage of a CPU can't be higher than the full
>> + * capacity of the CPU because it's about the running time on this CPU.
>> + * Nevertheless, cfs.utilization_load_avg can be higher than SCHED_LOAD_SCALE
>> + * because of unfortunate rounding in avg_period and running_load_avg or just
>> + * after migrating tasks until the average stabilizes with the new running
>> + * time. So we need to check that the usage stays into the range
>> + * [0..cpu_capacity_orig] and cap if necessary.
>> + * Without capping the usage, a group could be seen as overloaded (CPU0 usage
>> + * at 121% + CPU1 usage at 80%) whereas CPU1 has 20% of available capacity/
>
> s/capacity\//capacity.

I have resent the patch with typo correction

>
> [...]
>
> -- Dietmar
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/