Re: [PATCH v2] mm: cma: fix CMA aligned offset calculation

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara <dpetigara@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara <dpetigara@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> >> The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
> >> non-zero order_per_bit values.
> >>
> >> For example, if cma->order_per_bit=1, cma->base_pfn=
> >> 0x2f800000 and align_order=12, the function returns
> >> a value of 0x17c00 instead of 0x400.
> >>
> >> This patch fixes the CMA aligned offset calculation.
> > 
> > When fixing a bug please always describe the end-user visible effects
> > of that bug.
> > 
> > Without that information others are unable to understand why you are
> > recommending a -stable backport.
> > 
> 
> Thank you for the feedback. I had no crash logs to show, nevertheless, I
> agree that a sentence describing potential effects of the bug would've
> helped.

What was the reason for adding a cc:stable?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/