Re: [PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, February 27, 2015 03:23:13 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:41:05 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree.  
> > 
> > Well, I've applied it too in the meantime. :-)
> > 
> > Also I'll have more commits on top of it, so it's better if it goes through
> > my tree I think, if you don't mind.
> 
> Gee, I feel like I've been here before :)
> 
> In the future, would you like me to avoid taking patches to
> Documentation/power?

Well, I tend to apply them as a rule, unless I overlook them.  That usually
happens if they aren't CCed to me directly or to linux-pm.

But yeah, you can safely avoid patches touching Documentation/power/ or
Documentation/acpi/, I'll be taking care of them.

> I'll drop it out of my tree.

Thanks!


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/