Re: [PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Friday, February 27, 2015 03:08:10 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:53:46 +0000
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > This patch updates the documentation regarding IRQF_NO_SUSPEND to make
> > this caveat explicit, hopefully making future misuse rarer. Cleanup of
> > existing misuse will occur as part of later patch series.
> 
> Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree.

Well, I've applied it too in the meantime. :-)

Also I'll have more commits on top of it, so it's better if it goes through
my tree I think, if you don't mind.

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/