Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] rtc: at91sam9: properly act when IRQ handler is called in suspended state

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Feb 25 2015 - 16:42:15 EST


On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 10:56:02 AM Boris Brezillon wrote:
> The IRQ line used by the RTC device is often shared with the system timer
> (PIT) on at91 platforms.
> Since timers are registering their handlers with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, we should
> expect being called in suspended state, and properly wake the system up
> when this is the case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
> index 2183fd2..8cf9c1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91sam9.c
> @@ -77,6 +77,8 @@ struct sam9_rtc {
> unsigned int gpbr_offset;
> int irq;
> struct clk *sclk;
> + unsigned long events;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> };
>
> #define rtt_readl(rtc, field) \
> @@ -271,14 +273,9 @@ static int at91_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * IRQ handler for the RTC
> - */
> -static irqreturn_t at91_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *_rtc)
> +static irqreturn_t at91_rtc_cache_events(struct sam9_rtc *rtc)
> {
> - struct sam9_rtc *rtc = _rtc;
> u32 sr, mr;
> - unsigned long events = 0;
>
> /* Shared interrupt may be for another device. Note: reading
> * SR clears it, so we must only read it in this irq handler!
> @@ -290,18 +287,54 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *_rtc)
>
> /* alarm status */
> if (sr & AT91_RTT_ALMS)
> - events |= (RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF);
> + rtc->events |= (RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF);
>
> /* timer update/increment */
> if (sr & AT91_RTT_RTTINC)
> - events |= (RTC_UF | RTC_IRQF);
> + rtc->events |= (RTC_UF | RTC_IRQF);
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static void at91_rtc_flush_events(struct sam9_rtc *rtc)
> +{
> + if (!rtc->events)
> + return;
>
> - rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtcdev, 1, events);
> + rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtcdev, 1, rtc->events);
> + rtc->events = 0;
>
> pr_debug("%s: num=%ld, events=0x%02lx\n", __func__,
> - events >> 8, events & 0x000000FF);
> + rtc->events >> 8, rtc->events & 0x000000FF);
> +}
>
> - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +/*
> + * IRQ handler for the RTC
> + */
> +static irqreturn_t at91_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *_rtc)
> +{
> + struct sam9_rtc *rtc = _rtc;
> + int ret;
> +
> + spin_lock(&rtc->lock);
> +
> + ret = at91_rtc_cache_events(rtc);
> +
> + /* We're called in suspended state */
> + if (irq_is_wakeup_armed(irq)) {

Instead of doing this, I would set a flag in the driver's ->suspend
callback (or in ->suspend_late, whichever is more convenient) and check
that flag here.

> + /* Mask irqs coming from this peripheral */
> + rtt_writel(rtc, MR,
> + rtt_readl(rtc, MR) &
> + ~(AT91_RTT_ALMIEN | AT91_RTT_RTTINCIEN));
> + /* Trigger a system wakeup */
> + irq_pm_force_wakeup();
> + } else {
> + at91_rtc_flush_events(rtc);
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock(&rtc->lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static const struct rtc_class_ops at91_rtc_ops = {
> @@ -499,10 +532,17 @@ static int at91_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
> u32 mr;
>
> if (rtc->imr) {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
> disable_irq_wake(rtc->irq);
> mr = rtt_readl(rtc, MR);
> rtt_writel(rtc, MR, mr | rtc->imr);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->lock, flags);
> + at91_rtc_cache_events(rtc);
> + at91_rtc_flush_events(rtc);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtc->lock, flags);
> }
>
> return 0;
>

--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/