Re: [PATCH] mm: cma: fix CMA aligned offset calculation

From: Danesh Petigara
Date: Tue Feb 24 2015 - 16:43:56 EST




On 2/24/2015 1:10 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24 2015, Danesh Petigara <dpetigara@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
>> non-zero order_per_bit values.
>>
>> For example, if cma->order_per_bit=1, cma->base_pfn=
>> 0x2f800000 and align_order=12, the function returns
>> a value of 0x17c00 instead of 0x400.
>>
>> This patch fixes the CMA aligned offset calculation.
>>
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Danesh Petigara <dpetigara@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> ---
>> mm/cma.c | 10 +++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
>> index 75016fd..58f37bd 100644
>> --- a/mm/cma.c
>> +++ b/mm/cma.c
>> @@ -70,9 +70,13 @@ static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_offset(struct cma *cma, int align_order)
>>
>> if (align_order <= cma->order_per_bit)
>> return 0;
>> - alignment = 1UL << (align_order - cma->order_per_bit);
>> - return ALIGN(cma->base_pfn, alignment) -
>> - (cma->base_pfn >> cma->order_per_bit);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Find a PFN aligned to the specified order and return
>> + * an offset represented in order_per_bits.
>> + */
>
> It probably makes sense to move this comment outside of the function as
> function documentation.
>

Thanks for the feedback. Will send out patch v2 with the comment moved
outside the function and also remove the unused 'alignment' variable.

>> + return (ALIGN(cma->base_pfn, (1UL << align_order))
>> + - cma->base_pfn) >> cma->order_per_bit;
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned long cma_bitmap_maxno(struct cma *cma)
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>

Best regards,
Danesh Petigara
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/