Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: entry.S: tidy up several suboptimal insns

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:13:03PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> They aren't equal.  $1 and $2 in two lowest bits will also
> be interpreted as "userspace" here. "Equal to $3" sends
> a wrong message here to a human reading the code,
> the code doesn't test for CPL=3, it tests for any nonzero CPL.

Doh, of course.

I was going to propose to make it even more explicit:

	andb $3, CS(%rsp)...

but that's destructive.

So yours makes it less misleading, actually. To me at least and
obviously.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/