Re: [PATCH 0/7] Serialise oopses, BUGs, WARNs, dump_stack, soft lockups and hard lockups

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 01:39:46AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> one of the question is if you want to serialize, or if you just want
> to label.  If you take a cookie (could just be a monotonic increasing
> number) at the start of the oops and then prefix/postfix the stack
> printing with that number, you don't serialize (risk of locking up),
> but you can pretty trivially see which line came from where..
> if you do the monotonic increasing number approach, you even get an
> ordering out of it. it does mean changing the dump_stack() and co
> function fingerprint to take an extra argument, but that is not TOO
> insane.

I like that idea, but it relies on ensuring that each line is printed
by one printk() statement - which in itself is a good idea.

I'd actually like a version of print_hex_dump() which we could use for
stack and code dumping - the existing print_hex_dump() assumes that it's
fine to dereference the pointer, whereas for stack and code dumping,
we can't always make that assumption.  That's a separate issue though.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/