Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/compaction: fix wrong order check in compact_finished()

From: Zhang Yanfei
Date: Sat Jan 31 2015 - 02:39:22 EST


Hello,

At 2015/1/30 20:34, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> What we want to check here is whether there is highorder freepage
> in buddy list of other migratetype in order to steal it without
> fragmentation. But, current code just checks cc->order which means
> allocation request order. So, this is wrong.
>
> Without this fix, non-movable synchronous compaction below pageblock order
> would not stopped until compaction is complete, because migratetype of most
> pageblocks are movable and high order freepage made by compaction is usually
> on movable type buddy list.
>
> There is some report related to this bug. See below link.
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg81666.html
>
> Although the issued system still has load spike comes from compaction,
> this makes that system completely stable and responsive according to
> his report.
>
> stress-highalloc test in mmtests with non movable order 7 allocation doesn't
> show any notable difference in allocation success rate, but, it shows more
> compaction success rate.
>
> Compaction success rate (Compaction success * 100 / Compaction stalls, %)
> 18.47 : 28.94
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> mm/compaction.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index b68736c..4954e19 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1173,7 +1173,7 @@ static int __compact_finished(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc,
> return COMPACT_PARTIAL;
>
> /* Job done if allocation would set block type */
> - if (cc->order >= pageblock_order && area->nr_free)
> + if (order >= pageblock_order && area->nr_free)
> return COMPACT_PARTIAL;
> }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/