Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86,fpu: use disable_task_lazy_fpu_restore helper

[Rik van Riel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/30/2015 04:46 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 09:49 AM, riel@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> @@ -440,8 +440,9 @@ static inline fpu_switch_t
>> switch_fpu_prepare(struct task_struct *old, struct ta 
>> new->thread.fpu_counter > 5); if (__thread_has_fpu(old)) { if
>> (!__save_init_fpu(old)) -			cpu = ~0; -		old->thread.fpu.last_cpu
>> = cpu; +			task_disable_lazy_fpu_restore(old); +		else +
>> old->thread.fpu.last_cpu = cpu;
> 
> What is the 'else' doing here?  It seems a bit disconnected from
> the other parts of the patch.

The assignment was already there before, but we would set
cpu to ~0 if __save_init_fpu failed.

Now there are different branches for failure and success,
with the success branch having the same assignment that
was there before.

- -- 
All rights reversed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUy/w1AAoJEM553pKExN6D/fsH/RjpQE67P368cvHl6QKa0RUo
TDF0iEl4XqLT9wlYPsr+NgVJG0rFK36iVrGtKVV/uziNmk+1H43WZUt/u8tsTC1k
gYptwOeBpGVyktmwdperBejTm3q4k9WLYASOvU90S2fMO5IavCpafkM5CJwojFie
0fquULSkgmyxXIJrNTNYznA2YYZaiHcKY8i05H9W0iLYbYQseQhDKl7sZ5uWcfd2
ziWmWpMKSgD0AaC1PbMm8k4kKHkbaKlabR9AyOd+9Nk5voU/pPcJOm4QgQru2ZhR
2wRdVA+MMwoglsPygV3I2OPqJN95o0JAgSTJk5DXfPuiMYoAe2+KWy5pa0ERvMo=
=Fmf0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/