Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints

From: Mike Turquette
Date: Thu Jan 29 2015 - 10:56:44 EST


On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 03:26 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-27 22:59:59)
>>> On 01/27/2015 01:55 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 01/23/15 03:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> in this v13 I have:
>>>>>
>>>>> * added the latest R-b tags from Stephen,
>>>>>
>>>>> * split some lines that went over the 80-char limit,
>>>>>
>>>>> * made explicit in the docs that the range limits are inclusive, and
>>>>>
>>>>> * removed an ifdef in clkdev.c by adding a dev_id param to __of_clk_get_by_name.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think this patch series is ready to go except for the last one? Do you
>>>> plan on polishing that one some more?
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> do you plan to merge this for 3.20?
>>
>> Tomeu,
>>
>> Yes. I have taken patches 1-5.
>>
>> I edited patch #3 to adapt clk_has_parent for struct clk_core.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=59cf3fcf9bafe8fdb6183f13dafb81fc8213a8f9
>>
>> Patch #4 need an update to convert sun6i_ahb1_clk_determine_rate to have
>> min/max rates.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=cb75a8fcd14e71c115decc416dd8d223e7c8b2e0
>>
>> Can you look it over and make sure I didn't screw anything up?
>
> Yup, they look good to me. I have also done some testing here.

Great! Thanks again for your hard work on this series.

Regards,
Mike

>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomeu
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/