Re: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] slub: never fail to shrink cache

From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Wed Jan 28 2015 - 21:31:44 EST


On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Andrew Morton wrote:

> The logic behind choosing "32" sounds rather rubbery. What goes wrong
> if we use, say, "4"?

Like more fragmentation of slab pages.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/