Re: [RFC 3/4] nbd: Create helper functions for ioctls

From: Paul Clements
Date: Wed Jan 28 2015 - 21:20:23 EST


Markus,

Comments below...

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Markus Pargmann <mpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch prepares the nbd code for the nbd-root device patch. It
> moves the ioctl code into separate functions so they can be called
> directly. The patch creates nbd_set_total_size(), nbd_set_blksize(),
> nbd_set_sock() and nbd_set_timeout().
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <mpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/block/nbd.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> index 0ff6ebbec252..11f7644be111 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
> @@ -596,6 +596,55 @@ static void do_nbd_request(struct request_queue *q)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Call with tx_lock held
> + */
> +static void nbd_set_total_size(struct block_device *bdev,
> + struct nbd_device *nbd, size_t size)
> +{
> + nbd->bytesize = size;
> + bdev->bd_inode->i_size = size;
> + set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> + set_capacity(nbd->disk, size >> 9);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Call with tx_lock held
> + */
> +static void nbd_set_blksize(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
> + size_t blksize)
> +{
> + u64 new_bytesize;
> +
> + nbd->blksize = blksize;
> + bdev->bd_inode->i_size = nbd->bytesize;
> + set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> +
> + new_bytesize = nbd->bytesize & ~(nbd->blksize-1);
> + if (new_bytesize != nbd->bytesize)
> + nbd_set_total_size(bdev, nbd, new_bytesize);

could just do set_capacity here to save a few cycles, but not a big
deal either way...


> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Call with tx_lock held
> + */
> +static void nbd_set_sock(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
> + struct socket *sock)
> +{
> + nbd->sock = sock;
> + if (max_part > 0)
> + bdev->bd_invalidated = 1;
> + nbd->disconnect = 0; /* we're connected now */
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Call with tx_lock held
> + */
> +static void nbd_set_timeout(struct nbd_device *nbd, int timeout)
> +{
> + nbd->xmit_timeout = timeout * HZ;
> +}
> +
> static int nbd_connection_start(struct block_device *bdev,
> struct nbd_device *nbd)
> {
> @@ -733,33 +782,22 @@ static int __nbd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
> if (nbd->sock)
> return -EBUSY;
> sock = sockfd_lookup(arg, &err);
> - if (sock) {
> - nbd->sock = sock;
> - if (max_part > 0)
> - bdev->bd_invalidated = 1;
> - nbd->disconnect = 0; /* we're connected now */
> - return 0;
> - }
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!sock)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + nbd_set_sock(bdev, nbd, sock);

need a return 0 here


> }
>
> case NBD_SET_BLKSIZE:
> - nbd->blksize = arg;
> - nbd->bytesize &= ~(nbd->blksize-1);
> - bdev->bd_inode->i_size = nbd->bytesize;
> - set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> - set_capacity(nbd->disk, nbd->bytesize >> 9);
> + nbd_set_blksize(bdev, nbd, arg);
> return 0;
>
> case NBD_SET_SIZE:
> - nbd->bytesize = arg & ~(nbd->blksize-1);
> - bdev->bd_inode->i_size = nbd->bytesize;
> - set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> - set_capacity(nbd->disk, nbd->bytesize >> 9);
> + nbd_set_total_size(bdev, nbd, arg & ~(nbd->blksize-1));
> return 0;

Might consider deprecating this one...it's pretty useless these days,
as it has the same function as NBD_SET_SIZE_BLOCKS, but has a smaller
device size limit (at least on some platforms)... nbd-client does not
use it anymore...


> case NBD_SET_TIMEOUT:
> - nbd->xmit_timeout = arg * HZ;
> + nbd_set_timeout(nbd, arg);
> return 0;
>
> case NBD_SET_FLAGS:
> @@ -767,10 +805,7 @@ static int __nbd_ioctl(struct block_device *bdev, struct nbd_device *nbd,
> return 0;
>
> case NBD_SET_SIZE_BLOCKS:
> - nbd->bytesize = ((u64) arg) * nbd->blksize;
> - bdev->bd_inode->i_size = nbd->bytesize;
> - set_blocksize(bdev, nbd->blksize);
> - set_capacity(nbd->disk, nbd->bytesize >> 9);
> + nbd_set_total_size(bdev, nbd, ((u64)arg) * nbd->blksize);
> return 0;
>
> case NBD_DO_IT:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/