Re: [PATCH 05/10] drivers/char: Support compiling out /dev/zero

From: josh
Date: Wed Jan 28 2015 - 21:00:38 EST


On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:07:51PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2015-01-23 12:37:11, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > Some embedded systems with tightly controlled userspace have no use
> > for /dev/zero, and could benefit from the size savings gained by
> > omitting it. Add a new EMBEDDED config option to disable it.
> >
> > bloat-o-meter (based on tinyconfig):
> >
> > add/remove: 0/3 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-391 (-391)
> > function old new delta
> > chr_dev_init 162 147 -15
> > mmap_zero 16 - -16
> > zero_fops 116 - -116
> > zero_bdi 244 - -244
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'm not sure that 400 bytes are worth additional Kconfig noise. .. and
> pretty much everyone needs /dev/zero...

Relatively few, actually, given MMAP_ANONYMOUS. Memory isn't allocated
via an mmap of /dev/zero. It's useful for systems with shells that want
to redirect from it or read from it, but less useful for environments
with entirely compiled code.

/dev/null is much more commonly needed, though there are still systems
that won't need it (and can just disable read/writes on an fd entirely
rather than duping /dev/null to that fd).

That said, I'd be entirely in favor of consolidating many of these
"miscellaneous character device" options into a couple of Kconfig
options. It doesn't seem critical to *individually* control each of
these files in /dev.

Personally, I'm hoping that we eventually end up with a disableable
CONFIG_CHAR similar to CONFIG_BLOCK.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/