Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: cma: release trigger

From: Joonsoo Kim
Date: Tue Jan 27 2015 - 03:09:00 EST


On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:26:05AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Provides a userspace interface to trigger a CMA release.
>
> Usage:
>
> echo [pages] > free
>
> This would provide testing/fuzzing access to the CMA release paths.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/cma_debug.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/cma_debug.c b/mm/cma_debug.c
> index 39c7116..0a63945 100644
> --- a/mm/cma_debug.c
> +++ b/mm/cma_debug.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/dma-contiguous.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/mm_types.h>

Is mm_types.h needed?

>
> #include "cma.h"
>
> @@ -43,6 +44,56 @@ static void cma_add_to_cma_mem_list(struct cma_mem *mem)
> spin_unlock(&cma_mem_head_lock);
> }
>
> +static struct cma_mem *cma_get_entry_from_list(void)
> +{
> + struct cma_mem *mem = NULL;
> +
> + spin_lock(&cma_mem_head_lock);
> + if (!hlist_empty(&cma_mem_head)) {
> + mem = hlist_entry(cma_mem_head.first, struct cma_mem, node);
> + hlist_del_init(&mem->node);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&cma_mem_head_lock);
> +
> + return mem;
> +}
> +
> +static int cma_free_mem(struct cma *cma, int count)
> +{
> + struct cma_mem *mem = NULL;
> +
> + while (count) {
> + mem = cma_get_entry_from_list();
> + if (mem == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (mem->n <= count) {
> + cma_release(cma, mem->p, mem->n);
> + count -= mem->n;
> + kfree(mem);
> + } else {
> + cma_release(cma, mem->p, count);
> + mem->p += count;
> + mem->n -= count;
> + count = 0;
> + cma_add_to_cma_mem_list(mem);
> + }
> + }

If order_per_bit is not 0 and count used in cma_release() is
different with the count used in cma_alloc(), problem could
occur since bitmap management code can't handle that situation.

Could we just disable this case in this testing module?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/