Re: [PATCH v3]PM/Sleep: Timer quiesce in freeze state

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Jan 26 2015 - 08:59:05 EST


On Monday, January 26, 2015 10:40:24 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> > On 2015/1/22 18:15, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Can we please stop adding more crap to that notifier thing? I rather
> > > see that go away than being expanded.
> >
> > Are you referring to FREEZE_PREPARE or remove all of FREEZE staff at all?
> >
> > What's the disadvantage of adding more notifier?
>
> clockevents_notify() is not a notifier. Its a multiplex call and I
> want to get rid of it and replace it with explicit functions.

OK, so perhaps we need to move _SUSPEND/_RESUME out of there to start with?

As far as I can say, clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND, NULL) and
clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME, NULL) are each only called from
one place and moreover, since they are in syscore_ops, we don't need any
locking around them.

So what about the patch below?


---
include/linux/clockchips.h | 2 --
kernel/time/clockevents.c | 9 ---------
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 6 ++++--
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/include/linux/clockchips.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/clockchips.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/clockchips.h
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ enum clock_event_nofitiers {
CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_FORCE,
CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER,
CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT,
- CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND,
- CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME,
CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_CPU_DYING,
CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_CPU_DEAD,
};
Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/clockevents.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/clockevents.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/time/clockevents.c
@@ -570,15 +570,6 @@ int clockevents_notify(unsigned long rea
tick_handover_do_timer(arg);
break;

- case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND:
- tick_suspend();
- tick_suspend_broadcast();
- break;
-
- case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME:
- tick_resume();
- break;
-
case CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_CPU_DEAD:
tick_shutdown_broadcast_oneshot(arg);
tick_shutdown_broadcast(arg);
Index: linux-pm/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)

touch_softlockup_watchdog();

- clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_RESUME, NULL);
+ tick_resume();

/* Resume hrtimers */
hrtimers_resume();
@@ -1299,7 +1299,9 @@ static int timekeeping_suspend(void)
write_seqcount_end(&tk_core.seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);

- clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_SUSPEND, NULL);
+ tick_suspend();
+ tick_suspend_broadcast();
+
clocksource_suspend();
clockevents_suspend();


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/