[PATCH 3.18 124/183] ftrace: Check both notrace and filter for old hash

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 7485058eea40783ac142a60c3e799fc66ce72583 upstream.

Using just the filter for checking for trampolines or regs is not enough
when updating the code against the records that represent all functions.
Both the filter hash and the notrace hash need to be checked.

To trigger this bug (using trace-cmd and perf):

 # perf probe -a do_fork
 # trace-cmd start -B foo -e probe
 # trace-cmd record -p function_graph -n do_fork sleep 1

The trace-cmd record at the end clears the filter before it disables
function_graph tracing and then that causes the accounting of the
ftrace function records to become incorrect and causes ftrace to bug.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150114154329.358378039@xxxxxxxxxxx

[ still need to switch old_hash_ops to old_ops_hash ]
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 kernel/trace/ftrace.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -2308,12 +2308,14 @@ static void ftrace_run_update_code(int c
 }
 
 static void ftrace_run_modify_code(struct ftrace_ops *ops, int command,
-				   struct ftrace_hash *old_hash)
+				   struct ftrace_ops_hash *old_hash)
 {
 	ops->flags |= FTRACE_OPS_FL_MODIFYING;
-	ops->old_hash.filter_hash = old_hash;
+	ops->old_hash.filter_hash = old_hash->filter_hash;
+	ops->old_hash.notrace_hash = old_hash->notrace_hash;
 	ftrace_run_update_code(command);
 	ops->old_hash.filter_hash = NULL;
+	ops->old_hash.notrace_hash = NULL;
 	ops->flags &= ~FTRACE_OPS_FL_MODIFYING;
 }
 
@@ -3357,7 +3359,7 @@ static struct ftrace_ops trace_probe_ops
 
 static int ftrace_probe_registered;
 
-static void __enable_ftrace_function_probe(struct ftrace_hash *old_hash)
+static void __enable_ftrace_function_probe(struct ftrace_ops_hash *old_hash)
 {
 	int ret;
 	int i;
@@ -3415,6 +3417,7 @@ int
 register_ftrace_function_probe(char *glob, struct ftrace_probe_ops *ops,
 			      void *data)
 {
+	struct ftrace_ops_hash old_hash_ops;
 	struct ftrace_func_probe *entry;
 	struct ftrace_hash **orig_hash = &trace_probe_ops.func_hash->filter_hash;
 	struct ftrace_hash *old_hash = *orig_hash;
@@ -3436,6 +3439,10 @@ register_ftrace_function_probe(char *glo
 
 	mutex_lock(&trace_probe_ops.func_hash->regex_lock);
 
+	old_hash_ops.filter_hash = old_hash;
+	/* Probes only have filters */
+	old_hash_ops.notrace_hash = NULL;
+
 	hash = alloc_and_copy_ftrace_hash(FTRACE_HASH_DEFAULT_BITS, old_hash);
 	if (!hash) {
 		count = -ENOMEM;
@@ -3496,7 +3503,7 @@ register_ftrace_function_probe(char *glo
 
 	ret = ftrace_hash_move(&trace_probe_ops, 1, orig_hash, hash);
 
-	__enable_ftrace_function_probe(old_hash);
+	__enable_ftrace_function_probe(&old_hash_ops);
 
 	if (!ret)
 		free_ftrace_hash_rcu(old_hash);
@@ -3784,7 +3791,7 @@ ftrace_match_addr(struct ftrace_hash *ha
 }
 
 static void ftrace_ops_update_code(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
-				   struct ftrace_hash *old_hash)
+				   struct ftrace_ops_hash *old_hash)
 {
 	struct ftrace_ops *op;
 
@@ -3819,6 +3826,7 @@ ftrace_set_hash(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 		unsigned long ip, int remove, int reset, int enable)
 {
 	struct ftrace_hash **orig_hash;
+	struct ftrace_ops_hash old_hash_ops;
 	struct ftrace_hash *old_hash;
 	struct ftrace_hash *hash;
 	int ret;
@@ -3855,9 +3863,11 @@ ftrace_set_hash(struct ftrace_ops *ops,
 
 	mutex_lock(&ftrace_lock);
 	old_hash = *orig_hash;
+	old_hash_ops.filter_hash = ops->func_hash->filter_hash;
+	old_hash_ops.notrace_hash = ops->func_hash->notrace_hash;
 	ret = ftrace_hash_move(ops, enable, orig_hash, hash);
 	if (!ret) {
-		ftrace_ops_update_code(ops, old_hash);
+		ftrace_ops_update_code(ops, &old_hash_ops);
 		free_ftrace_hash_rcu(old_hash);
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&ftrace_lock);
@@ -4066,6 +4076,7 @@ static void __init set_ftrace_early_filt
 int ftrace_regex_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
 	struct seq_file *m = (struct seq_file *)file->private_data;
+	struct ftrace_ops_hash old_hash_ops;
 	struct ftrace_iterator *iter;
 	struct ftrace_hash **orig_hash;
 	struct ftrace_hash *old_hash;
@@ -4099,10 +4110,12 @@ int ftrace_regex_release(struct inode *i
 
 		mutex_lock(&ftrace_lock);
 		old_hash = *orig_hash;
+		old_hash_ops.filter_hash = iter->ops->func_hash->filter_hash;
+		old_hash_ops.notrace_hash = iter->ops->func_hash->notrace_hash;
 		ret = ftrace_hash_move(iter->ops, filter_hash,
 				       orig_hash, iter->hash);
 		if (!ret) {
-			ftrace_ops_update_code(iter->ops, old_hash);
+			ftrace_ops_update_code(iter->ops, &old_hash_ops);
 			free_ftrace_hash_rcu(old_hash);
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&ftrace_lock);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/