Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Sat Jan 24 2015 - 06:03:35 EST


On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ong, Boon Leong
<boon.leong.ong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>+static int imr_enabled(struct imr_regs *imr)
> Do we want to make it inline perhaps since it is 1 liner?

Since it is declared static I would even suggest the new name is_imr_enabled().

[]

>>+int imr_remove_range(int reg, unsigned long base, unsigned long size)
>>+{
>>+ struct imr_regs imr;
>>+ int found = 0, i, ret = 0;
> Please make each of the defined variables as individual line here..

I would suggest to type i as unsigned int and found as bool.

[]

>>+ if (!imr_enabled(&imr) || imr.addr_lo & IMR_LOCK) {
>>+ ret = -ENODEV;
>>+ goto done;
>>+ }
>>+ found = 1;
>>+

Redundant empty line.

>>+ } else {
>>+ /* Search for match based on address range */
>>+ for (i = 0; i < imr_dev.max_imr; i++) {
>>+ ret = imr_read(reg, &imr);
> A serious bug here.... 'reg' should be 'i' . We enter this branch if reg=-1
> Is there a miss in your test case?
>
>>+ if (ret)
>>+ goto done;
>>+
>>+ if (!imr_enabled(&imr) || imr.addr_lo & IMR_LOCK)
>>+ continue;
>>+
>>+ if ((imr_to_phys(imr.addr_lo) == base) &&
>>+ (imr_to_phys(imr.addr_hi) == max)) {
> I think we need to take care of the size that has been fix-up here ...
>
>>+ found = 1;
>>+ reg = i;

According to your comment this line becomes redundant.

[]

>>+static void __init imr_fixup_memmap(void)
>>+{
>>+ unsigned long base = virt_to_phys(&_text);
>>+ unsigned long size = virt_to_phys(&__end_rodata) - base;
> What about the size fixup to be consistent?
> We should not guard more than it is needed .....
>
>>+ int i, ret;
> Two int declaration line here.

unsigned int i; ?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/