Re: [PATCH 10/10] clocksource: Add some debug info about clocksources being registered

From: John Stultz
Date: Wed Jan 21 2015 - 19:51:13 EST


On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 04:34 PM, John Stultz wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>> index 9a0b951..c641aa7 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
>> @@ -770,6 +770,10 @@ void __clocksource_updatefreq_scale(struct clocksource *cs, u32 scale, u32 freq)
>> cs->max_idle_ns = clocks_calc_max_nsecs(cs->mult, cs->shift,
>> cs->maxadj, cs->mask,
>> &cs->max_cycles);
>> +
>> + pr_info("clocksource %s: mask: 0x%llx max_cycles: 0x%llx, max_idle_ns: %lld ns\n",
>> + cs->name, cs->mask, cs->max_cycles, cs->max_idle_ns);
>
> Is this intentionally info level? Or was it supposed to be debug level
> per $subject?

Sorry for not getting back on this sooner. Since this is a
one-time-at-bootup message, I think enabling the pr_debug output is a
little too finicky for most folks to boot with. So I left it at
pr_info. If folks object, I can change it, but it just seems less
likely we'd get any useful data if it was so hidden by default.

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/