Re: [PATCH 6/6] UBI: Fastmap: Make ubi_refill_pools() fair

From: Tanya Brokhman
Date: Sun Dec 07 2014 - 02:55:43 EST


Hi Richard

On 12/5/2014 10:56 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
-/**
- * refill_wl_user_pool - refills all the fastmap pool used by ubi_wl_get_peb.
- * @ubi: UBI device description object
- */
-static void refill_wl_user_pool(struct ubi_device *ubi)
-{
- struct ubi_fm_pool *pool = &ubi->fm_pool;
+ pool->pebs[pool->size] = e->pnum;
+ pool->size++;
+ } else
+ enough++;

- return_unused_pool_pebs(ubi, pool);
+ if (wl_pool->size < wl_pool->max_size) {
+ if (!ubi->free.rb_node ||
+ (ubi->free_count - ubi->beb_rsvd_pebs < 5))
+ break;

- for (pool->size = 0; pool->size < pool->max_size; pool->size++) {
- pool->pebs[pool->size] = __wl_get_peb(ubi);
- if (pool->pebs[pool->size] < 0)
+ e = find_wl_entry(ubi, &ubi->free, WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF);
+ self_check_in_wl_tree(ubi, e, &ubi->free);
+ rb_erase(&e->u.rb, &ubi->free);
+ ubi->free_count--;

why don't you use wl_get_peb() here?

Because wl_get_peb() is not equivalent to the above code.
We want a PEB to be used for wear-leveling not for "end users" like UBIFS.

sorry, my mistake. I meant wl_get_wle() (the new function). the only diff between wl_get_wle() and the above is that you use find_wl_entry() and wl_get_wle() uses find_mean_wl_entry() and takes the anchor into consideration. So I;m trying to understand why wl_get_wle() isn't good here?


Thanks,
//richard



Thanks,
Tanya Brokhman
--
Qualcomm Israel, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/