[PATCH v2] kernfs: Fix kernfs_name_compare

From: Rasmus Villemoes
Date: Fri Dec 05 2014 - 17:41:57 EST


Returning a difference from a comparison functions is usually wrong
(see acbbe6fbb240 "kcmp: fix standard comparison bug" for the long
story). Here there is the additional twist that if the void pointers
ns and kn->ns happen to differ by a multiple of 2^32,
kernfs_name_compare returns 0, falsely reporting a match to the
caller.

Technically 'hash - kn->hash' is ok since the hashes are restricted to
31 bits, but it's better to avoid that subtlety.

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

Notes:
v2: Also use explicit < > comparisons of the hashes.

fs/kernfs/dir.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
index 1c771931bb60..bf9e2f44c3df 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
@@ -201,10 +201,14 @@ static unsigned int kernfs_name_hash(const char *name, const void *ns)
static int kernfs_name_compare(unsigned int hash, const char *name,
const void *ns, const struct kernfs_node *kn)
{
- if (hash != kn->hash)
- return hash - kn->hash;
- if (ns != kn->ns)
- return ns - kn->ns;
+ if (hash < kn->hash)
+ return -1;
+ if (hash > kn->hash)
+ return 1;
+ if (ns < kn->ns)
+ return -1;
+ if (ns > kn->ns)
+ return 1;
return strcmp(name, kn->name);
}

--
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/