Re: [RFC v2] arm:extend the reserved mrmory for initrd to be page aligned

[Peter Maydell]

On 5 December 2014 at 17:27, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 05:07:45PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:05:06PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > Care to submit this as a proper patch? We should at least fix Peter's issue
>> > before doing things like extending headers, which won't work for older
>> > kernels anyway.
>>
>> Quick fix is the revert of the whole patch, together with removing
>> PAGE_ALIGN(end) in poison_init_mem() on arm32. If Russell is ok with
>> this patch, we can take it via the arm64 tree, otherwise I'll send you a
>> partial revert only for the arm64 part.
>
> Not really.  Let's look at the history.
>
> For years, we've been poisoning memory, page aligning the end pointer.
> This has never been an issue.

Depends what you mean by "never been an issue". I had to change
QEMU (commit 98ed805c, January 2013) for 32-bit ARM back when the
kernel started trashing the tail end of the page after the initrd
with the poisoning, to 4K-align the dtb so it didn't share a page
with the initrd-tail. That nobody else complained suggests that most
bootloaders don't in practice overlap the two, though (ie that
QEMU is an outlier in how it chooses to arrange things in memory).

I should probably have reported the breakage at the time, but
I took the pragmatic (lazy?) approach of just changing our
bootloader code.

thanks
-- PMM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/