Re: [PATCH 4/5] MODSIGN: Provide a utility to append a PKCS#7 signature to a module [ver #2]

From: David Howells
Date: Fri Dec 05 2014 - 09:04:29 EST

Next message: Michal Hocko: "Re: [patch] mm, oom: remove gfp helper function"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: release struct_mutex on the i915_gem_init_hw fail path"
In reply to: Dmitry Kasatkin: "{Filename?} Re: [PATCH 4/5] MODSIGN: Provide a utility to append a PKCS#7 signature to a module [ver #2]"
Next in thread: Dmitry Kasatkin: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] MODSIGN: Provide a utility to append a PKCS#7 signature to a module [ver #2]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> With just "make all" on Ubuntu.

What gcc? I don't see any warnings.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michal Hocko: "Re: [patch] mm, oom: remove gfp helper function"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: release struct_mutex on the i915_gem_init_hw fail path"
In reply to: Dmitry Kasatkin: "{Filename?} Re: [PATCH 4/5] MODSIGN: Provide a utility to append a PKCS#7 signature to a module [ver #2]"
Next in thread: Dmitry Kasatkin: "Re: [PATCH 4/5] MODSIGN: Provide a utility to append a PKCS#7 signature to a module [ver #2]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]