Re: [PATCH] mfd: dln2: add suspend/resume functionality

[Octavian Purdila]

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 01:57:14PM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
>
>> @@ -753,11 +759,42 @@ static const struct usb_device_id dln2_table[] = {
>>
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, dln2_table);
>
> Place the new callbacks above the device id table.
>
>> +static int dln2_suspend(struct usb_interface *iface, pm_message_t message)
>> +{
>> +     struct dln2_dev *dln2 = usb_get_intfdata(iface);
>> +
>> +     dln2_stop(dln2);
>
> You should also stop the reads urbs here.

Do you mean usb_kill_urb()? I thought that was not necessary unless
the device is reset. However, going throught
Documentation/usb/power-management.txt again looks like it must be
done in suspend.

>
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dln2_resume(struct usb_interface *iface)
>> +{
>> +     struct dln2_dev *dln2 = usb_get_intfdata(iface);
>> +
>> +     dln2->disconnect = false;
>
> And surely you need to resubmit the read urbs in resume, or you will
> never receive any more data.
>
> How did you test this patch?
>

The resume cb is not called in my setup (kvm), only reset_resume. But
I assume since the port is not reset when resume is called the URBs
are still queued.

>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int dln2_reset_resume(struct usb_interface *iface)
>> +{
>> +     struct dln2_dev *dln2 = usb_get_intfdata(iface);
>> +     int ret;
>> +
>> +     dln2_free_rx_urbs(dln2);
>> +     ret = dln2_setup_rx_urbs(dln2, iface->cur_altsetting);
>
> This doesn't make much sense. Why would you ever want to reallocate the
> urbs and their buffers here?
>
> If the device does not lose its state as you claim, then all you need to
> do is to resubmit the read urbs (as in resume).
>

The device itself does not lose state as it does not lose power and
does not react to USB port reset AFAICS (e.g. GPIO settings are
preserved). However the USB port is reset and I assumed I must
reallocate the URBs.

I just found out that usb-serial uses usb_poisoin_urb and
usb_unpoison_urb for suspend/resume and this two looks like just what
I need. Should I use that instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/