[PATCH 8/9] s390/kvm: REPLACE ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE

From: Christian Borntraeger
Date: Wed Dec 03 2014 - 17:32:06 EST


ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)

Change the ipte lock code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
index 0f961a1..8f195fa 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
@@ -229,10 +229,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
- old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
while (old.k) {
cond_resched();
- old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
}
new = old;
new.k = 1;
@@ -251,7 +251,8 @@ static void ipte_unlock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
- new = old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
+ new = old;
new.k = 0;
} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
wake_up(&vcpu->kvm->arch.ipte_wq);
@@ -265,10 +266,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
- old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
while (old.kg) {
cond_resched();
- old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
}
new = old;
new.k = 1;
@@ -282,7 +283,8 @@ static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
- new = old = ACCESS_ONCE(*ic);
+ old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
+ new = old;
new.kh--;
if (!new.kh)
new.k = 0;
--
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/