Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: restore calling of .suspend/resume_noirq() callbacks

From: Grygorii Strashko
Date: Thu Nov 13 2014 - 13:44:13 EST


Hi Rafael,

On 11/13/2014 03:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 06:00:47 PM Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Now .suspend/resume_noirq() callbacks will not be called during
>> system wide suspend/resume for devices which belongs to some GPD.
>> It seems, that this change was accidentally introduced by
>> commit d23b9b00cdde ("PM / Domains: Rework system suspend callback
>> routines (v2)").
>
> I'm not sure if that was really accidentally.
>
> Can you describe the problem that the change below is attempting to
> address, without going to much into the history? IOW, what's that
> doesn't work right now?

There are no real issues - now in Kernel there are no users of GPD
which use "noirq" callbacks.

As of now, I'm trying to use GPD for Keyatone2, so
I'm studying it and playing with it to understand all benefits and
disadvantages of such solution.

So, I've found this issue, but not found any description of why
calls of these callbacks have been removed.
I'd very appreciate if can point me on?

>
>> This patch restores calling of .suspend/resume_noirq() callbacks
>> for devices from GPD during system wide suspend/resume.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
...

Regards,
-grygorii


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/