Re: [PATCH V3 4/8] xen: Delay invalidating extra memory

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Date: Wed Nov 12 2014 - 17:11:00 EST


> @@ -376,12 +374,14 @@ void __init xen_build_dynamic_phys_to_machine(void)
> unsigned long max_pfn;
> unsigned long pfn;
>
> - if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))
> + if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap))

Spurious change.

.. snip..
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> index 0e5f9b6..8d5985b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static unsigned long xen_remap_mfn __initdata = INVALID_P2M_ENTRY;
>
> static void __init xen_add_extra_mem(u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> - unsigned long pfn;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < XEN_EXTRA_MEM_MAX_REGIONS; i++) {
> @@ -95,17 +94,74 @@ static void __init xen_add_extra_mem(u64 start, u64 size)
> printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: not enough extra memory regions\n");
>
> memblock_reserve(start, size);
> +}
>
> - xen_max_p2m_pfn = PFN_DOWN(start + size);
> - for (pfn = PFN_DOWN(start); pfn < xen_max_p2m_pfn; pfn++) {
> - unsigned long mfn = pfn_to_mfn(pfn);
> +static void __init xen_del_extra_mem(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + int i;
> + u64 start_r, size_r;
>
> - if (WARN_ONCE(mfn == pfn, "Trying to over-write 1-1 mapping (pfn: %lx)\n", pfn))
> - continue;
> - WARN_ONCE(mfn != INVALID_P2M_ENTRY, "Trying to remove %lx which has %lx mfn!\n",
> - pfn, mfn);
> + for (i = 0; i < XEN_EXTRA_MEM_MAX_REGIONS; i++) {
> + start_r = xen_extra_mem[i].start;
> + size_r = xen_extra_mem[i].size;
> +
> + /* Start of region. */
> + if (start_r == start) {
> + BUG_ON(size > size_r);
> + xen_extra_mem[i].start += size;
> + xen_extra_mem[i].size -= size;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* End of region. */
> + if (start_r + size_r == start + size) {
> + BUG_ON(size > size_r);
> + xen_extra_mem[i].size -= size;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* Mid of region. */
> + if (start > start_r && start < start_r + size_r) {
> + BUG_ON(start + size > start_r + size_r);
> + xen_extra_mem[i].size = start - start_r;
> + xen_add_extra_mem(start + size, start_r + size_r -
> + (start + size));

Which ends up calling 'memblock_reserve' for an region it already has
reserved. Should we call memblock_free(start_r, size_r - size) before calling this?

Or is that not neccessary as memblock_* is pretty smart about this sort of thing?

> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + memblock_free(start, size);
> +}
> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/