Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/123] 3.10.60-stable review

[Guenter Roeck]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 04:22:34PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 03:22:55PM +0900, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:21:48PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 11/11/2014 05:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.60 release.
> > > >There are 123 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > >let me know.
> > > >
> > > >Responses should be made by Fri Nov 14 01:17:00 UTC 2014.
> > > >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > As an early heads up, I see some builds failing in 3.10 and 3.14 with
> > > 
> > > drivers/of/selftest.c: In function 'of_selftest':
> > > drivers/of/selftest.c:224:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'of_selftest_property_match_string' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > >   of_selftest_property_match_string();
> > >   ^
> > > drivers/of/selftest.c: At top level:
> > > drivers/of/selftest.c:129:20: warning: 'of_selftest_property_string' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > >  static void __init of_selftest_property_string(void)
> > >                     ^
> > > 
> > > Not surprising, since commit 'of: Fix overflow bug in string property
> > > parsing functions' replaces the now missing function with the defined
> > > but unused function, apparently without changing the caller.
> > > Oddly enough, the referenced upstream commit _does_ replace the
> > > function name for both caller and callee.
> > 
> > Crap, I took the "ignore the rejects" too literally when applying that
> > patch, let me go rework it and see if I can fix it up.
> 
> And I've fixed it now.  I doubt it's worth rolling a new -rc release for
> this, given the low number of builds that are failing.
> 
Confirmed to be fixed.

Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/