Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c: Skip EPROBE_DEFER error messages

From: Michal Simek
Date: Thu Oct 23 2014 - 08:02:46 EST


Hi Chris,

On 10/23/2014 01:31 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> When the error code is -EPROBE_DEFER, this will already be reported
> so don't emit an error message in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> index 7ac6718..d5812a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ static int sdhci_arasan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_arasan_pdata, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(host)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(host);
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform init failed (%d)\n", ret);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform init failed (%d)\n", ret);
> goto clk_disable_all;
> }
>
> @@ -172,7 +173,8 @@ static int sdhci_arasan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = sdhci_add_host(host);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform register failed (%d)\n", ret);
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "platform register failed (%d)\n", ret);
> goto err_pltfm_free;
> }


I checked other drivers and they are not reporting these bugs. I have briefly looked
at sdhci_add_host and sdhci_platfm_init and they are pretty good error description
+ core itself should report if driver probe failed.
That's why I think that it is just reasonable to remove these both dev_err completely.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/