Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] Another go at speculative page faults

[Kirill A. Shutemov]

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:23:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > My Ivy Bridge EP (2*10*2) has a ~58% improvement in pagefault throughput:
> > 
> > PRE:
> >        149,441,555      page-faults                  ( +-  1.25% )
> >
> > POST:
> >        236,442,626      page-faults                  ( +-  0.08% )
> 
> > My Ivy Bridge EX (4*15*2) has a ~78% improvement in pagefault throughput:
> > 
> > PRE:
> >        105,789,078      page-faults                 ( +-  2.24% )
> >
> > POST:
> >        187,751,767      page-faults                 ( +-  2.24% )
> 
> I guess the 'PRE' and 'POST' numbers should be flipped around?

I think it's faults per second.

It would be interesting to see if the patchset affects non-condended case.
Like a one-threaded workload.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/