Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/dl: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl()

[Juri Lelli]

Hi Kirill,

sorry for the late reply, but I was busy doing other stuff and then
travelling.

On 02/10/14 11:05, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> Ð ÐÑ, 02/10/2014 Ð 11:34 +0200, Peter Zijlstra ÐÐÑÐÑ:
>> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 01:04:22AM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>>> From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> hrtimer_try_to_cancel() may bring a suprise, its call may fail.
>>
>> Well, not really a surprise that, its a _try_ operation after all.
>>
>>> raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
>>> ...                            dl_task_timer                 raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
>>> ...                               raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)   ...
>>>    switched_from_dl()             ...                        ...
>>>       hrtimer_try_to_cancel()     ...                        ...
>>>    switched_to_fair()             ...                        ...
>>> ...                               ...                        ...
>>> ...                               ...                        ...
>>> raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)        ...                        (asquired)
>>> ...                               ...                        ...
>>> ...                               ...                        ...
>>> do_exit()                         ...                        ...
>>>    schedule()                     ...                        ...
>>>       raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)    ...                        raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)
>>>       ...                         ...                        ...
>>>       raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)  ...                        raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
>>>       ...                         ...                        (asquired)
>>>       put_task_struct()           ...                        ...
>>>           free_task_struct()      ...                        ...
>>>       ...                         ...                        raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)
>>> ...                               (asquired)                 ...
>>> ...                               ...                        ...
>>> ...                               Surprise!!!                ...
>>>
>>> So, let's implement 100% guaranteed way to cancel the timer and let's
>>> be sure we are safe even in very unlikely situations.
>>>
>>> We do not create any problem with rq unlocking, because it already
>>> may happed below in pull_dl_task(). No problem with deadline tasks
>>> balancing too.
>>
>> That doesn't sound right. pull_dl_task() is an entirely different
>> callchain than switched_from(). Now it might still be fine, but you
>> cannot compare it with pull_dl_task.
> 
> I mean that caller of switched_from_dl() already knows about this situation,
> and we do not limit the area of its use.
> 

Not sure what you mean with "the caller already knows...". Also, can you
detail more about the different callchains?

Do you have any test for this situation? Do you experienced any crash?
As you know, the replenishment timer is of key importance for us, and
I'd like to be 100% sure we don't introduce any problems with this
change :).

Thanks a lot,

- Juri

> Does this sound better?
> 
> [PATCH] sched/dl: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl()
>     
> Currently used hrtimer_try_to_cancel() is racy:
> 
> raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
> ...                            dl_task_timer                 raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
> ...                               raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)   ...
>    switched_from_dl()             ...                        ...
>       hrtimer_try_to_cancel()     ...                        ...
>    switched_to_fair()             ...                        ...
> ...                               ...                        ...
> ...                               ...                        ...
> raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)        ...                        (asquired)
> ...                               ...                        ...
> ...                               ...                        ...
> do_exit()                         ...                        ...
>    schedule()                     ...                        ...
>       raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)    ...                        raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)
>       ...                         ...                        ...
>       raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)  ...                        raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock)
>       ...                         ...                        (asquired)
>       put_task_struct()           ...                        ...
>           free_task_struct()      ...                        ...
>       ...                         ...                        raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock)
> ...                               (asquired)                 ...
> ...                               ...                        ...
> ...                               (use after free)           ...
> 
>     
> So, let's implement 100% guaranteed way to cancel the timer and let's
> be sure we are safe even in very unlikely situations.
> 
> rq unlocking does not limit the area of switched_from_dl() use, because
> it already was possible in pull_dl_task() below.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index abfaf3d..63f8b4a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -555,11 +555,6 @@ void init_dl_task_timer(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
>  {
>  	struct hrtimer *timer = &dl_se->dl_timer;
>  
> -	if (hrtimer_active(timer)) {
> -		hrtimer_try_to_cancel(timer);
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	hrtimer_init(timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>  	timer->function = dl_task_timer;
>  }
> @@ -1567,10 +1562,34 @@ void init_sched_dl_class(void)
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>  
> +/*
> + *  Surely cancel task's dl_timer. May drop rq->lock.
> + */
> +static void cancel_dl_timer(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	struct hrtimer *dl_timer = &p->dl.dl_timer;
> +
> +	/* Nobody will change task's class if pi_lock is held */
> +	lockdep_assert_held(&p->pi_lock);
> +
> +	if (hrtimer_active(dl_timer)) {
> +		int ret = hrtimer_try_to_cancel(dl_timer);
> +
> +		if (unlikely(ret == -1)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Note, p may migrate OR new deadline tasks
> +			 * may appear in rq when we are unlocking it.
> +			 */
> +			raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> +			hrtimer_cancel(dl_timer);
> +			raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> -	if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.dl_timer) && !dl_policy(p->policy))
> -		hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&p->dl.dl_timer);
> +	cancel_dl_timer(rq, p);
>  
>  	__dl_clear_params(p);
>  
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/