Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] gpio: Support for unified device properties interface

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 20 October 2014 01:58:57 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> Actually, since the two last patches in the series, which currently are
> the only users of these new functions, both pass "gpios" as the property
> name and 0 as the index, I can simplify the functions so that (a)
> fwnode_get_gpiod() takes fwnode and name and then simply passes 0 as the
> index to either of_get_named_gpiod_flags() or acpi_get_gpiod_by_index()
> and (b) devm_get_named_gpiod_from_child() takes only dev and fwnode (child)
> and passes "gpios" as the property name to fwnode_get_gpiod().  The name
> of devm_get_named_gpiod_from_child() could then be changed to something
> like devm_get_gpiod_from_child() even.
> 
> If anyone in the future needs anything more general, they can simply
> add more complexity to that code, but for now we can go for a simplified
> interface just fine.
> 

That sounds good, yes.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/