Re: [PATCH] kernel: use the gnu89 standard explicitly

[Al Viro]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 02:10:31AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 04:05:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's one example how it fails: http://marc.info/?l=gcc&m=141349914632010&w=2
> > 
> > Ok, that just looks like a gnu11 bug, then. Not being able to
> > initialize structures because some sub-structure has a volatile member
> > is just pure BS.
> > 
> > Has anybody reported this as a gcc bug? That email may be on the gcc
> > list, but I'm not seeing anybody acknowledge it as a bug..
> > 
> > I cannot imagine that anybody sane claims that this is *wanted*
> > behavior from "gnu11".
> 
> IIUC, it's nothing to do with volatile. C11 and above reads
> 
> 	(rwlock_t) { .raw_lock = { 0 }, }
> 
> as compound literal (which is not constant) rather than constant
> initalizer plus a cast.

Ah...  They hadn't even pulled it into gnu99; IIRC, they even tried to
remove it in gnu89, but Linus' complaints had stopped that attempt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/