Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl: Resolve missing-field-initializers warnings

From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Sat Oct 18 2014 - 20:40:17 EST


Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> From: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Resolve missing-field-initializers warnings in W=2 builds by
> using designated initialization.

ick. No.

That gcc warning makes no sense. In this case heeding it makes the code
significantly uglier and significantly more confusing.

Eric


> Signed-off-by: Mark Rustad <mark.d.rustad@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sysctl.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
> index 4aada6d..5623845 100644
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static struct ctl_table sysctl_base_table[] = {
> .mode = 0555,
> .child = dev_table,
> },
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
> },
> #endif
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
> @@ -1485,12 +1485,12 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
> .mode = 0644,
> .proc_handler = proc_doulongvec_minmax,
> },
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC) || defined(CONFIG_BINFMT_MISC_MODULE)
> static struct ctl_table binfmt_misc_table[] = {
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
> #endif
>
> @@ -1658,7 +1658,7 @@ static struct ctl_table fs_table[] = {
> .proc_handler = &pipe_proc_fn,
> .extra1 = &pipe_min_size,
> },
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> static struct ctl_table debug_table[] = {
> @@ -1682,11 +1682,11 @@ static struct ctl_table debug_table[] = {
> .extra2 = &one,
> },
> #endif
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> static struct ctl_table dev_table[] = {
> - { }
> + { .procname = NULL }
> };
>
> int __init sysctl_init(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/