Re: [PATCH v2 35/53] dmaengine: sh: Split device_control

From: Laurent Pinchart
Date: Thu Oct 16 2014 - 12:17:40 EST


Hi Maxime,

Thank you for the patch.

On Thursday 16 October 2014 12:17:34 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Split the device_control callback of the Super-H DMA driver to make use of
> the newly introduced callbacks, that will eventually be used to retrieve
> slave capabilities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/sh/shdma-base.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/shdma-base.c b/drivers/dma/sh/shdma-base.c
> index 42d497416196..eda59515f704 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sh/shdma-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/shdma-base.c
> @@ -727,8 +727,7 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor
> *shdma_prep_dma_cyclic( return desc;
> }
>
> -static int shdma_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd,
> - unsigned long arg)
> +static int shdma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *chan)
> {
> struct shdma_chan *schan = to_shdma_chan(chan);
> struct shdma_dev *sdev = to_shdma_dev(chan->device);
> @@ -737,43 +736,41 @@ static int shdma_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum
> dma_ctrl_cmd cmd, unsigned long flags;
> int ret;
>
> - switch (cmd) {
> - case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL:
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&schan->chan_lock, flags);
> - ops->halt_channel(schan);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&schan->chan_lock, flags);
> + ops->halt_channel(schan);
>
> - if (ops->get_partial && !list_empty(&schan->ld_queue)) {
> - /* Record partial transfer */
> - struct shdma_desc *desc = list_first_entry(&schan->ld_queue,
> - struct shdma_desc, node);
> - desc->partial = ops->get_partial(schan, desc);
> - }
> + if (ops->get_partial && !list_empty(&schan->ld_queue)) {
> + /* Record partial transfer */
> + struct shdma_desc *desc = list_first_entry(&schan->ld_queue,
> + struct shdma_desc, node);
> + desc->partial = ops->get_partial(schan, desc);
> + }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&schan->chan_lock, flags);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&schan->chan_lock, flags);
>
> - shdma_chan_ld_cleanup(schan, true);
> - break;
> - case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG:
> - /*
> - * So far only .slave_id is used, but the slave drivers are
> - * encouraged to also set a transfer direction and an address.
> - */
> - if (!arg)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - /*
> - * We could lock this, but you shouldn't be configuring the
> - * channel, while using it...
> - */
> - config = (struct dma_slave_config *)arg;
> - ret = shdma_setup_slave(schan, config->slave_id,
> - config->direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM ?
> - config->src_addr : config->dst_addr);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - break;
> - default:
> - return -ENXIO;
> - }
> + shdma_chan_ld_cleanup(schan, true);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int shdma_config(struct dma_chan *chan,
> + struct dma_slave_config *config)
> +{
> + struct shdma_chan *schan = to_shdma_chan(chan);
> +
> + /*
> + * So far only .slave_id is used, but the slave drivers are
> + * encouraged to also set a transfer direction and an address.
> + */
> + if (!config)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + /*
> + * We could lock this, but you shouldn't be configuring the
> + * channel, while using it...
> + */
> + return shdma_setup_slave(schan, config->slave_id,
> + config->direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM ?
> + config->src_addr : config->dst_addr);
>
> return 0;

You can remove the return 0. With this fixed,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> }
> @@ -1000,7 +997,8 @@ int shdma_init(struct device *dev, struct shdma_dev
> *sdev, /* Compulsory for DMA_SLAVE fields */
> dma_dev->device_prep_slave_sg = shdma_prep_slave_sg;
> dma_dev->device_prep_dma_cyclic = shdma_prep_dma_cyclic;
> - dma_dev->device_control = shdma_control;
> + dma_dev->device_config = shdma_config;
> + dma_dev->device_terminate_all = shdma_terminate_all;
>
> dma_dev->dev = dev;

--
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/