Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] kernel: Add support for restart handler call chain
From: Guenter Roeck
Date: Tue Sep 30 2014 - 23:29:08 EST
On 09/30/2014 04:40 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:30:00 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 02:20:02PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:45:27 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Introduce a system restart handler call chain to solve the described problems.
So someone has merged eight of these patches into linux-next but these
three:
watchdog-s3c2410-add-restart-handler.patch
clk-samsung-register-restart-handlers-for-s3c2412-and-s3c2443.patch
clk-rockchip-add-restart-handler.patch
were omitted. What's up?
Most likely PBKC on my side; Looks like I forgot to add those when I created
the immutable branch for others to merge. Sorry for that :-(.
Having said that, I somehow thought that the clock patches would go in through
the clock tree. Heiko, did I get that wrong ? Separately, I sent a pull request
that includes the watchdog patch to Wim.
So far, that immutable branch has been merged into the battery tree
(and thus into linux-next) by Sebastian in order to add (I assume):
18a702e0de98 power: reset: use restart_notifier mechanism for msm-poweroff
371bb20d6927 power: Add simple gpio-restart driver
on top of it.
So, I guess the watchdog and clk trees also need to merge that
immutable branch and then add their respective patches from the mmotm
series to their trees.
Yes, and now I remember why I did not include those patches: They are not
authored by myself. I thought it was not appropriate for me to include them
in the branch I created. Maybe flawed thinking, but that was my reasoning.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/