[PATCH 3.13 099/103] i2c: at91: Fix a race condition during signal handling in at91_do_twi_xfer.

[Kamal Mostafa]

3.13.11.8 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Simon Lindgren <simon@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 6721f28a26efd6368497abbdef5dcfc59608d899 upstream.

There is a race condition in at91_do_twi_xfer when signals arrive.
If a signal is recieved while waiting for a transfer to complete
wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout() will return -ERESTARTSYS.
This is not handled correctly resulting in interrupts still being
enabled and a transfer being in flight when we return.

Symptoms include a range of oopses and bus lockups. Oopses can happen
when the transfer completes because the interrupt handler will corrupt
the stack. If a new transfer is started before the interrupt fires
the controller will start a new transfer in the middle of the old one,
resulting in confused slaves and a locked bus.

To avoid this, use wait_for_completion_io_timeout instead so that we
don't have to deal with gracefully shutting down the transfer and
disabling the interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Simon Lindgren <simon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
index d13d3bb..ae4cdc0 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
@@ -421,8 +421,8 @@ static int at91_do_twi_transfer(struct at91_twi_dev *dev)
 		}
 	}
 
-	ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&dev->cmd_complete,
-							dev->adapter.timeout);
+	ret = wait_for_completion_io_timeout(&dev->cmd_complete,
+					     dev->adapter.timeout);
 	if (ret == 0) {
 		dev_err(dev->dev, "controller timed out\n");
 		at91_init_twi_bus(dev);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/