Re: [PATCH] i2c: qup: Fix order of runtime pm initialization

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Tue 30 Sep 12:59 PDT 2014, Andy Gross wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:53:24PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 29 Sep 15:00 PDT 2014, Andy Gross wrote:
> > 
> > > The runtime pm calls need to be done before populating the children via the
> > > i2c_add_adapter call.  If this is not done, a child can run into issues trying
> > > to do i2c read/writes due to the pm_runtime_sync failing.
> > > 
> > 
> > May I ask in what case this would fail?  I thought we tested this as we found
> > the faulty error check after calling pm_runtime_get_sync().
> 
> This is a different kind of failure.   If during probe, the children do some I2C
> activity, they will encounter issues with the runtime_sync due to the pm_runtime
> not being initialized.  However, once the qup probe completes, everything works
> fine.
> 
> The original runtime_sync issue revolved around the runtime_sync return value
> being misinterpreted due to the incorrect check.
> 

Yeah, I just wondered why my testing didn't trigger this. But I suspect that
the answer is simply that the client I ran with did not do i2c accesses from
probe.

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/